Crop insurance

1. Economic rationale and the nature of agricultural risk

Agriculture faces production, price, institutional and financial risks. Drought, floods, cyclones, hailstorms, pests and diseases can reduce output even when farmers follow recommended practices. Weather shocks are often covariate: they affect many cultivators in the same region simultaneously. Consequently, borrowing from neighbours, selling livestock or relying on local savings may not provide adequate protection. Crop insurance pools eligible losses across locations and seasons, while reinsurance spreads exceptionally large liabilities beyond the primary insurer.

Insurance is a contractual arrangement: a premium purchases protection against defined risks during a specified period. It differs from disaster relief, which is government assistance under prescribed norms, and from a loan waiver, which extinguishes specified debt. It also differs from the Minimum Support Price mechanism, which addresses prices rather than insured production losses. Neither insurance nor MSP automatically assures a positive net income.

Affordable insurance can stabilise consumption, protect repayment capacity and encourage investment in better seeds and inputs. Nevertheless, correlated losses, limited farm-level records and expensive loss verification make purely commercial insurance difficult for smallholders. Public premium subsidies therefore play a major role. Insurance should complement irrigation, drainage, resilient varieties, extension services and diversification, rather than substitute for prevention and adaptation.

• Adverse selection occurs when cultivators facing higher risks are more likely to purchase insurance.
• Moral hazard arises when insurance weakens incentives to prevent losses; area and index approaches partly limit this problem.
• Basis risk is the mismatch between a farmer’s actual loss and the payout generated by an area yield or weather index.

2. PMFBY: eligibility, premiums and institutional design

The Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare administers PMFBY through cooperation among participating states and Union Territories, empanelled insurers, banks and other enrolment channels. States notify crops, insurance units, season-specific deadlines and other operational details, and select insurers through bidding. Farmers cultivating notified crops in notified areas may enrol subject to scheme requirements. Sharecroppers and tenant farmers are eligible in principle, but must provide the documentation prescribed to establish their insurable interest.

The farmer pays a capped share of the sum insured: 2% for Kharif food and oilseed crops, 1.5% for Rabi food and oilseed crops, and 5% for annual commercial and horticultural crops, or the actuarial premium rate if lower. These percentages are premium rates, not compensation limits. The remaining eligible premium is subsidised by governments. Central and state subsidy sharing is generally 50:50, with a 90:10 arrangement for northeastern states.

Under the revamped framework effective from Kharif 2020, central premium-subsidy support is limited to actuarial premium rates of 30% in unirrigated areas or crops and 25% in irrigated areas or crops. Where premium rates exceed these limits, the additional subsidy responsibility rests with the state. This funding rule must not be confused with the much lower farmer premium caps.

Participation has been voluntary for all farmers since Kharif 2020; earlier, insurance was compulsory for eligible loanee farmers. A crop loan or Kisan Credit Card therefore does not now make participation universally compulsory. Availability also depends on state participation and seasonal notification. Land-record discrepancies, unrecorded tenancy and errors in crop or bank details can prevent otherwise vulnerable cultivators from obtaining effective coverage.

• The sum insured represents the notified insured value per hectare multiplied by the insured area, not the premium paid.
• The actuarial premium reflects the insurer’s assessment of risk and programme costs.
• Enrolment must be completed within the notified deadline; protection cannot ordinarily be purchased after a loss has occurred.

3. Covered risks, assessment and claim calculation

PMFBY covers specified non-preventable risks affecting standing crops, including drought, dry spells, floods, inundation, storms, cyclones, pests and diseases, subject to operational guidelines and notification. Other provisions address prevented sowing or planting, adverse mid-season conditions, specified localised calamities and eligible post-harvest losses. These categories have different triggers and assessment procedures; their presence should not be interpreted as unrestricted protection against every agricultural loss.

For widespread losses, the scheme generally uses an area approach. The notified insurance unit is commonly the village or village panchayat for major crops, although the applicable unit follows the notification. Actual yield is estimated through prescribed crop-cutting experiments and approved technology-supported methods. Farmers within an insurance unit are assessed against the same unit-level yield outcome, rather than solely against their own field’s harvest.

Threshold yield is calculated from the average yield of the best five years out of the preceding seven years, multiplied by the applicable indemnity level. Indemnity levels are 70%, 80% or 90%, reflecting the notified risk category. When actual yield falls below threshold yield, the standard claim equals the yield shortfall divided by threshold yield, multiplied by the sum insured. Thus, threshold yield of 2 tonnes per hectare, actual yield of 1.5 tonnes and a sum insured of Rs 40,000 produce a claim of Rs 10,000.

Specified localised losses, such as hailstorm, landslide and inundation, are assessed at the individual-farm level. Eligible post-harvest cover extends for up to 14 days after harvesting for specified crops kept in prescribed cut-and-spread or small-bundled conditions in the field, against listed perils. It is not general warehouse or storage insurance. Farmers normally need to report localised and post-harvest losses within 72 hours through authorised channels.

• A low individual yield does not automatically generate an area-based claim if the insurance unit’s yield remains above the threshold.
• Conversely, a farmer may receive an area-based payout even when that farmer’s field performs better than the unit average.
• War, nuclear risks, malicious damage and other preventable or excluded losses are not ordinary insured agricultural perils.

4. Weather-index insurance and technology

RWBCIS links payouts to deviations in notified weather parameters, such as rainfall, temperature, humidity or wind speed. A crop-specific term sheet specifies reference weather stations, coverage periods, triggers and payout rules. Once recorded conditions meet the contractual trigger, a payout can be calculated without waiting for the conventional assessment of every affected plot. Its farmer premium caps broadly follow the PMFBY structure.

Weather-index insurance can reduce verification costs and accelerate settlement, but accuracy depends on station density, equipment reliability and whether the index captures the crop’s actual vulnerability. A farmer may suffer moisture stress while the reference station records adequate rainfall. Alternatively, an index may trigger compensation despite limited damage on a particular plot. These are examples of basis risk.

Digital initiatives seek to improve both access and assessment. The National Crop Insurance Portal supports enrolment and programme administration. YES-TECH promotes technology-based yield estimation, while WINDS strengthens weather-data infrastructure. CROPIC uses crop photographs and observation for monitoring. Satellite imagery, geotagged observations and automated weather stations can strengthen evidence, but require transparent validation, reliable connectivity and mechanisms to contest errors.

• Yield insurance asks whether the notified area’s output fell below a benchmark.
• Weather-index insurance asks whether the specified weather trigger was crossed.
• Neither mechanism is equivalent to compensation for a market-price collapse.

5. Implementation constraints and reform priorities

The effectiveness of insurance depends on timely enrolment, credible loss estimates and prompt settlement. Delays may arise from late state subsidy payments, incomplete yield data, disputes over assessments, incorrect account details and administrative bottlenecks. Farmers may also misunderstand what is insured, especially when premiums are deducted through banking channels without adequate explanation of crop, area or coverage conditions.

An effective reform agenda combines smaller and more representative insurance units, stronger weather networks, independent data-quality checks, clear claim-status tracking and accessible grievance redress. Tenant inclusion requires workable proof of cultivation without creating unnecessary fears about ownership rights. Transparent publication of notifications, insurer responsibilities and settlement performance can strengthen accountability.

Climate change increases the importance of catastrophe financing and regularly updated risk models. However, expansion of subsidies alone is insufficient. Insurance must be integrated with agro-climatic planning, water conservation and diversified livelihoods so that it finances residual risk rather than perpetuating avoidable exposure.

• Assess performance through coverage quality, inclusion, settlement time and income protection, not merely enrolment numbers.
• Maintain distinct roles for insurance payouts, disaster relief, agricultural credit and price support.

Previous year questions

No UPSC question has been asked directly on this micro-topic yet. Use the practice questions below.

Practice questions