Vijayanagara

1. Origins, geography and sources

Vijayanagara developed during the political reorganisation of the Deccan and southern India following the expansion and subsequent weakening of Delhi Sultanate authority. Harihara I and Bukka I established the kingdom in 1336 according to the conventional chronology. Accounts of their earlier careers and the precise role of the religious teacher Vidyaranya differ across traditions; these should not be treated as equally secure historical facts. The kingdom incorporated territories and institutions associated with earlier powers, including the Hoysalas.

The capital’s location combined strategic protection with access to resources. Granite ridges, the Tungabhadra River and substantial fortifications provided defensive advantages. Cultivated valleys, tanks and canals supported a large urban population. Control of routes connecting the interior with ports on both coasts helped rulers secure horses, revenue and prestige goods.

Evidence includes inscriptions, coins, literary compositions, temple records, archaeological remains and foreign accounts. Nicolo Conti visited in the early fifteenth century; the Persian envoy Abdur Razzaq described the kingdom during Devaraya II’s reign. Domingo Paes observed Krishnadevaraya’s capital, while Fernao Nuniz recorded historical traditions in the sixteenth century. Their descriptions are valuable but reflect differing interests and sometimes exaggerated estimates.

2. Dynasties, expansion and political conflict

The Sangamas consolidated the early empire. Devaraya II, who ruled approximately from 1422 to 1446, was an important military and cultural patron. Accounts associate him with employing Muslim cavalrymen and archers, illustrating the pragmatic recruitment of military expertise. Saluva Narasimha displaced the Sangamas in 1485; the Tuluva dynasty subsequently gained power in 1505. Dynastic change did not automatically replace the underlying institutions of government.

Krishnadevaraya brought the empire to a high point between 1509 and 1529. He campaigned against the Gajapatis of Odisha, captured Udayagiri and Kondavidu, and defeated the ruler of Bijapur at Raichur in 1520. The fertile Raichur Doab between the Krishna and Tungabhadra rivers was repeatedly contested. Warfare also concerned forts, ports, agricultural resources and access to the imported warhorses essential for cavalry.

After Krishnadevaraya and Achyutadevaraya, Aliya Rama Raya exercised effective authority under the nominal ruler Sadashiva Raya. His interventions in Deccan sultanate politics contributed to a hostile coalition. At Talikota, also called Rakshasi-Tangadi, in 1565, the coalition defeated Vijayanagara and Rama Raya was killed. The capital was subsequently plundered. Aravidu rulers continued from centres including Penukonda and Chandragiri, while regional Nayaka powers became increasingly autonomous.

• Avoid reducing conflict to a simple Hindu–Muslim binary: alliances, soldiers and political interests frequently crossed religious boundaries.
• Distinguish the destruction of the imperial capital in 1565 from the later decline of Aravidu political authority.

3. Administration and the amara-nayaka system

The king stood at the centre of government, supported by ministers, military commanders, court officials and provincial authorities. Royal legitimacy drew on conquest, protection of religious institutions, public ceremonies and claims to uphold dharma. Actual control varied across regions and depended on negotiations with local chiefs, landed groups and religious establishments.

The amara-nayaka system connected revenue rights with military service. Amara-nayakas were commanders assigned territories from which they collected revenue. They retained resources for maintaining troops, horses and elephants, remitted a portion to the ruler and appeared at court with gifts. Some revenue supported temples and irrigation. Their assignments were not simply modern private ownership of land.

The system enabled expansion without a uniformly centralised bureaucracy, but powerful commanders could build regional bases. Over time, some offices and territorial claims became increasingly hereditary. The later Nayaka states of Madurai and Thanjavur emerged from this wider political environment. For comparison with the Delhi Sultanate’s iqta, focus on revenue assignments and military obligations without assuming that the institutions were identical.

4. Agriculture, trade and social relations

Agriculture financed the state and sustained cities, armies and temples. Land revenue was important, alongside customs, commercial levies and occupational taxes. Assessment and collection varied by locality, cultivation and land category. Rulers, commanders, temples and local communities supported tanks, wells and canals. Hydraulic works in and around the capital demonstrate the connection between water management, agricultural production and political authority.

Trade linked inland markets with the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal. Horses arrived through maritime networks involving Arab and Persian merchants and, increasingly after the Portuguese capture of Goa in 1510, Portuguese traders. Textiles, rice, spices and precious stones circulated through regional and overseas exchange. Gold coins, commonly called varahas or pagodas, were important instruments of high-value transactions.

Society was differentiated by caste, occupation, wealth and access to power. Brahmanas received land grants and served as scholars and officials; merchants, cultivators, artisans and pastoral groups sustained production and exchange. Women participated in agriculture, craft work, commerce and courtly life, but opportunities were unequal. Inscriptions and travellers record temple women and sati, yet neither practice should be generalised to all women or regions. Temples organised employment, redistribution and social hierarchy as well as worship.

5. Religion, literature and courtly culture

Vijayanagara rulers patronised several religious traditions rather than one uniform sectarian establishment. Virupaksha, a form of Shiva, was closely associated with the capital’s sacred identity. Vaishnava institutions also received extensive support, notably under Krishnadevaraya, who made major donations to Tirupati. Royal patronage strengthened temples as landed institutions and connected the monarchy with influential religious communities.

Sanskrit, Telugu, Kannada and Tamil literary cultures flourished through overlapping courtly and religious networks. Krishnadevaraya’s Telugu Amuktamalyada centres on Andal’s devotion to Vishnu and includes reflections on kingship. His court is traditionally associated with eight Telugu poets, the Ashtadiggajas, including Allasani Peddana. In Kannada-speaking regions, the Haridasa devotional tradition included Purandaradasa and Kanakadasa. Literary achievement should therefore be understood as multilingual and regionally diverse, not confined to the imperial court.

6. Hampi: architecture and urban landscape

Hampi’s remains reveal sacred, royal and residential zones, although these categories overlapped. Monumental temple complexes developed tall raya gopurams, pillared mandapas and kalyana mandapas for ceremonial marriages of deities. The Vitthala temple is famous for its stone chariot, a Garuda shrine, while the Hazara Rama temple contains Ramayana reliefs. Long bazaar streets near temples linked ritual activity with commerce.

The Mahanavami Dibba was an elevated ceremonial platform associated with royal display and festival activity. Structures conventionally called the Lotus Mahal and Elephant Stables incorporate arches and domes, showing interaction with wider Deccan architectural traditions. Multiple defensive walls enclosed not only buildings but also agricultural land. Tanks, channels and stepped water structures further demonstrate that Vijayanagara architecture must be studied as an urban landscape rather than merely a collection of temples.

Previous year questions

Practice questions