NULM 2.0 Uncertainty: Urban Livelihoods, Women’s SHGs and Centre–State Funding
Revise the static topic: UPSC Social Justice notes
In short: At least five states have sought funds or clarification from the Centre to sustain urban livelihood institutions amid uncertainty over a successor to DAY-NULM. The funding gap threatens women’s self-help groups, bank linkages, interest subsidies and frontline personnel, highlighting why scheme transitions must protect existing beneficiaries and verified financial commitments.
File photograph accompanying reporting on states’ requests for DAY-NULM funds, used as a reference view rather than an image of the current funding dispute.
Image: Indian Express
Why in news
The Indian Express reports that Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Tripura have approached the Centre over funding shortages affecting urban livelihood programmes. DAY-NULM ran until October 2024, while the subsequent DJAY-S pilot continued until December 2025; the report indicates that the successor scheme remains uncertain.
At least 5
States seeking funds or clarity
More than 1 crore
Women benefited over the last decade
Over 10 lakh
Women’s SHGs created
Rs 350 crore
Tamil Nadu request for 2026–27
Rs 80.99 crore
Central share sought by Maharashtra
Rs 101 crore
Funds sought by Madhya Pradesh
Background
DAY-NULM was an urban poverty alleviation mission administered by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. Its approach combined community mobilisation through self-help groups and federations with financial inclusion, self-employment support, skill development and support for vulnerable urban groups. Unlike a wage-employment guarantee, it sought to strengthen the institutions and capabilities through which poor households access livelihoods. Article 243W, read with the Twelfth Schedule, provides the constitutional framework for states to endow municipalities with responsibilities that include urban poverty alleviation; actual devolution depends on state law.
What the funding dispute involves
The dispute concerns continuity of an existing livelihood ecosystem, not merely the launch of a new scheme. States report exhausted balances, unpaid personnel costs and accumulating liabilities for interest subvention and revolving funds.
The requests differ in purpose and should not be treated as a single category of arrears. Tamil Nadu seeks support for 2026–27, Maharashtra seeks Central share to clear previous dues, Madhya Pradesh highlights continuing interest subsidy commitments, and Karnataka seeks permission to use pilot funds for staff salaries.
- Tamil Nadu says its NULM funds were exhausted by April 2025 and seeks Rs 350 crore to sustain the programme.
- Maharashtra reports that its last NULM release was in March 2024 and seeks Rs 80.99 crore as Central share.
- Madhya Pradesh seeks Rs 101 crore, including Rs 13.71 crore for interest subsidy under the self-employment programme.
- Tripura sought Rs 6.50 crore for committed liabilities and warned of damage to community institutions and institutional credit access.
- Karnataka seeks clarity on using Bengaluru’s Rs 4.48 crore pilot allocation for staff salaries, reporting no available funds for salaries from July 2025 onwards.
Infographic
Protect beneficiaries
Verify and settle admissible support linked to existing commitments.
Preserve institutions
Maintain SHGs, federations and essential frontline support.
Bridge the funding gap
Provide clear interim financing rather than uncertain reimbursement alone.
Clarify responsibilities
Define Centre, state and municipal roles and permissible expenditure.
Measure livelihoods
Track enterprise continuity, credit support and women’s economic agency.
AI-assisted infographic by Pragnya IAS Academy, based on the cited sources.
Why women’s collectives need institutional continuity
Women’s SHGs are more than channels for distributing financial assistance. Regular savings, collective decision-making, bank relationships and enterprise support can strengthen women’s economic agency and reduce dependence on informal borrowing. Federations, community resource persons and bank sakhis help sustain these functions.
Tripura’s experience illustrates the livelihood role of these institutions: SHGs are engaged in mid-day meal services, canteen operations, school uniform stitching and municipal service delivery. A prolonged funding interruption can weaken the support systems connecting these activities to credit and public-service opportunities.
- Delayed interest subvention can raise the effective borrowing burden for eligible beneficiaries even while loan repayments continue.
- Unpaid mission personnel can weaken mobilisation, bookkeeping support, bank coordination and beneficiary follow-up.
- Disrupted institutional support risks eroding relationships and organisational capacity built over several years.
- Credit access alone cannot secure sustainable livelihoods without viable enterprises, market demand and timely payments.
The transition gap: approval, financing and reimbursement
Following DAY-NULM, the Deendayal Jan Aajeevika Yojana–Shehari pilot operated in 25 cities across 13 states. The report says it was intended to pave the way for a successor scheme, but reports, citing sources, that the proposed new scheme was no longer under consideration. This is not the same as a published final decision on a successor mission.
In its December 4, 2024 communication, MoHUA referred to in-principle approval to expand the pilot and asked states and Union Territories to retain the existing administrative structure. Human-resource costs were to be met from urban local bodies’ own resources or already approved available MoHUA scheme funds, with transition expenditure proposed for recoupment under a new mission.
This arrangement creates a timing and certainty problem: expenditure must be incurred immediately, while reimbursement is linked to a future mission. In-principle approval, a proposal for recoupment and an actual fund release are distinct administrative stages.
- Retaining personnel requires an identified and usable interim funding source.
- Existing pilot balances cannot automatically be assumed to be available for every expenditure head.
- Reimbursement proposals need clear eligibility rules, verification procedures and a payment schedule.
Federal and legal dimensions
Urban poverty alleviation involves the Union’s programme framework, state-level implementation and municipal delivery. Where local resources must bridge an uncertain transition, differences in fiscal capacity can translate into unequal service continuity across cities and states.
Madhya Pradesh argues that closing or not extending a scheme does not automatically extinguish eligible interest subsidy obligations arising from loans already sanctioned. This is a claim concerning continuing commitments, not a judicial determination. Liability must be assessed against scheme guidelines, loan eligibility, sanction terms and verified records.
Article 243W does not itself guarantee a particular Central grant. Nevertheless, predictable intergovernmental financing is essential if states and municipalities are expected to retain staff, protect beneficiary support and honour approved commitments during a redesign.
- Separate legacy obligations from proposed expenditure under a successor programme.
- Distinguish beneficiary-linked support from administrative costs when verifying claims.
- Avoid interpreting a scheme’s closure as either automatic cancellation or automatic validation of every outstanding claim.
| Funding issue | Risk if unresolved | Appropriate response |
|---|---|---|
| Accrued eligible interest subsidy | Beneficiaries face uncertainty over promised borrowing-cost relief | Verify eligibility and settle admissible claims against sanctioned loans |
| Personnel remuneration | Frontline support and bank coordination weaken | Provide explicit interim financing and staffing instructions |
| Revolving fund liabilities | Group-level financial support is delayed | Reconcile approved commitments and release admissible amounts |
| Use of pilot allocations | Available balances remain unusable for urgent needs | Clarify permissible expenditure heads and approval requirements |
| Successor mission funding | States cannot plan continuity or expansion confidently | Publish the policy decision, transition framework and funding calendar |
- 1. Mission funding becomes delayed or uncertain.
- 2. Personnel remuneration and beneficiary-linked support accumulate as liabilities.
- 3. SHG handholding, bank coordination and subsidy processing weaken.
- 4. Credit access and enterprise continuity come under pressure.
- 5. Household income security and confidence in community institutions may deteriorate.
2014
The reported operating period of DAY-NULM begins.
October 2024
DAY-NULM reaches the end of its reported operating period, and the transition to the DJAY-S pilot begins.
December 4, 2024
MoHUA communicates in-principle approval for expanding the pilot and asks states and Union Territories to retain existing administrative structures.
April 2025
Tamil Nadu reports that its NULM funds had been completely exhausted by this point.
July 2025 onwards
Karnataka reports that funds were unavailable for staff salary disbursement.
December 2025
The DJAY-S pilot reaches the end of its reported duration.
Significance, challenges & way forward
Significance
- The issue places continuity of urban poverty alleviation at the centre of scheme redesign.
- Women’s collectives represent accumulated social and institutional capacity that cannot be rebuilt simply through a fresh allocation.
- Predictable funding helps maintain the credibility of government-supported credit arrangements.
- Cross-state requests indicate a coordination problem extending beyond a single state’s implementation difficulties.
- The transition offers an opportunity to link livelihood support more effectively with municipal services and local economic opportunities.
Challenges
- Uncertainty over the successor mission limits planning for personnel, beneficiaries and financial commitments.
- Existing loans may outlast the scheme period, complicating the treatment of interest subsidy claims.
- Reliance on local own resources may produce unequal continuity where municipal fiscal capacities differ.
- Restrictions on expenditure heads can prevent states from using available pilot balances for urgent staffing needs.
- A focus on SHG formation alone may obscure enterprise viability, income stability and the quality of institutional support.
Way forward
- MoHUA should issue a definitive transition clarification covering the successor scheme’s status, interim responsibilities and permissible expenditure.
- The Centre and states should establish a verified inventory of beneficiary-linked liabilities, administrative dues and unspent balances.
- Provide time-bound bridge financing for essential services and admissible commitments without presuming approval of a new mission.
- Clarify treatment of eligible interest subsidies on existing loans and communicate the process to beneficiaries and banks.
- Use transparent release and reconciliation schedules, with accessible grievance channels for delayed payments.
- Evaluate livelihood outcomes through enterprise continuity, timely credit support and women’s economic agency rather than group formation alone.
- Strengthen municipal capacity and connect SHGs with lawful procurement opportunities, skills, markets and social protection.
Key terms
- DAY-NULM
- Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana–National Urban Livelihoods Mission, an urban poverty alleviation programme centred on livelihood opportunities and community institutions.
- DJAY-S
- Deendayal Jan Aajeevika Yojana–Shehari, the pilot described in the report as a bridge towards a proposed successor urban livelihood scheme.
- Self-help group
- A voluntary collective that promotes regular savings, mutual support and access to credit or livelihood opportunities.
- Interest subvention
- Financial support that reduces the interest burden on eligible borrowing under specified scheme conditions.
- Revolving fund
- A fund whose resources can be reused as money is repaid or replenished, supporting continuing group-level financial needs.
- Committed liabilities
- Payment obligations arising from previously approved activities or commitments, subject to applicable rules and verification.
- Recoupment
- Reimbursement of expenditure already incurred, subject to approval and applicable conditions.
- Bank sakhi
- A community-level woman facilitator who helps beneficiaries navigate banking and financial inclusion services.
Link with static syllabus
Prelims practice MCQs
Q1. With reference to urban local government in India, consider the following statements: 1. Urban poverty alleviation is included in the Twelfth Schedule. 2. Article 243W enables state legislatures to endow municipalities with powers and responsibilities. 3. Article 243W guarantees municipalities a fixed Central grant for livelihood missions. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Q2. In the context of livelihood programmes, which of the following best describes interest subvention?
Q3. Consider the following pairs: 1. DAY-NULM — Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs 2. Recoupment — Reimbursement of expenditure already incurred 3. Bank sakhi — Constitutional authority for auditing municipal accounts Which of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Q4. With reference to the reported transition from DAY-NULM, consider the following statements: 1. DJAY-S was implemented as a pilot following DAY-NULM. 2. MoHUA advised retention of existing state and Union Territory administrative structures for continuity. 3. The proposal to recoup transition expenditure was equivalent to an immediate release of funds. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Mains practice questions
GS 2 · 15 marks · 250 words
Transitions between welfare schemes must protect existing beneficiaries and community institutions. Examine this statement in the context of uncertainty over the successor to DAY-NULM.
Frequently asked questions
Has NULM 2.0 been officially launched?
The supplied report does not establish an official launch. It describes uncertainty over a successor scheme following DAY-NULM and the DJAY-S pilot.
Why do states need funds after DAY-NULM has ended?
States report outstanding personnel costs, revolving fund commitments and eligible interest subsidy claims linked to existing loans. They also seek resources to preserve community institutions and essential beneficiary support.
Does closing a scheme automatically cancel interest subsidies on existing loans?
Madhya Pradesh argues that eligible accrued obligations continue despite scheme closure. The admissibility of each claim depends on applicable guidelines, sanction terms and verified records.
Why are women’s SHGs central to this issue?
They connect poor urban women with savings, institutional credit, collective enterprises and livelihood services. Interruptions in personnel support and financing can weaken these connections even where groups remain formally registered.
Sources
- Indian Express: States seek urgent funds to sustain women livelihood mission, no word on NULM 2.0 yet
Analysis prepared by the Pragnya IAS Academy current-affairs desk with AI assistance from the cited reports. Verify figures with the original sources.
Turn current affairs into marks
Join Pragnya IAS Academy's mentorship for daily answer-writing evaluation on stories like this.